Find conversations worth replying to
Start with your website. Search public conversations on Reddit, Quora and LinkedIn, review the evidence for each match, and edit suggested replies before you post.
Create an account, review your setup, then choose a plan or available sample.
- Screened for buyer intent and fit with your business
- Reads only, never posts
- Your voice, your account
Worth replying to
12 threads scored this morning for acmecrm.com
Easiest way to track leads without losing follow-ups?
Describes the exact workflow gap you close, and is shopping now.
What should a small business look for when choosing a CRM?
Evergreen question, ranks in Google, quoted in AI answers.
We switched CRMs and finally keep every web lead in one place
Public evaluation. Peers in the comments asking what they picked.
Put in your website and find threads to reply to, in three steps
Nothing to install and no social accounts to connect. Add a website address, check what ThreadSpot plans to search, and review the results.
Step 1
Drafted for you
Acme is lead-tracking software for owner-operated businesses that lose follow-ups between the inbox, the form and DMs.
Fix anything that's wrongPut in your website
ThreadSpot reads your site and works out what you sell, who buys it and what problems you fix. You correct anything it got wrong.
Step 2
full scans start when you press go
Check what it will search
Review the proposed search terms and communities before your lead scan. Reddit setup may sample public posts to check communities. Remove targets outside your market, then start the scan.
Step 3
Easiest way to track leads without losing follow-ups?
“The thing that usually breaks follow-ups isn't the tool…”
you post it, from your account
Reply to the threads it finds
You get a list of threads, a score for each one, the reason it was picked, and a written draft. You edit it and post it yourself.
We search the sites where your buyers ask questions
What ThreadSpot does after you add your website
From describing your business to reviewing conversations and preparing a reply.
It reads your site and learns what you sell
Put in a website address and ThreadSpot writes down what you sell, who buys it and the problems you solve, then hands it back for you to correct. Everything after this is built on it, so read it properly.
- One URL in, a full brief out
- Who it's for, and who it isn't
- Fully editable, so your words beat its guess
What ThreadSpot read
You review the search before the lead scan
Search terms, keywords, communities and exclusions are proposed for your review. Reddit setup may sample public posts to assess proposed communities. Review the targets before starting a lead scan.
- Queries and keywords proposed, not assumed
- See which communities were sampled
- Rule out anything that isn't your market
Candidate posts get a relevance score
Candidate posts receive an evidence review and an independent second assessment. Results distinguish qualified, uncertain and unsuitable candidates. A failed review stays separate from a rejection; earlier results may still show a numeric score.
- Knows if someone is researching, comparing, switching or asking
- Every score shows the signals behind it
- Review lower scores in Everything
Easiest way to track leads without losing follow-ups?
A reply draft you can post as your own
Qualified candidates can include a draft after its claims and usefulness have been checked. Review community rules and edit the reply before posting. Some candidates have no draft when a check cannot finish.
- Written from that specific thread, not a template
- Matched to the norms of that specific community
- Yours to edit. Nothing is posted for you, ever.
The thing that usually breaks follow-ups isn't the tool. It's that leads arrive in four places and only two get checked. Before you compare features, work out where yours actually land.
Anything that pulls all four into one timeline fixes 80% of this. We built Acme around that idea , but the principle holds whatever you land on.
It tells you why it picked each thread
Read the reason behind each scored candidate. Mark a result as handled or not a lead to organize your queue, and edit your targeting when you want to change what is searched.
- The reasoning travels with the thread
- Record your review for each result
- Exportable for client reporting
Surfaced because they name the follow-up gap and ask for a recommendation, in a community where vendor answers are allowed.
After one “not for us”: this result leaves your open queue.
Run again when you need fresh conversations
Start scans when you need fresh conversations. Saved reviews stay with each result so you can see what you have handled.
- Saved results, ready to review
- Deduplicated against everything you've done
- Full history per site, exportable
Never posts for you
It cannot post, comment, vote or message. We never ask for your accounts.
Shows its reasoning
Every score comes with the reason behind it, so you can disagree.
Keeps your results together
Review saved conversations and mark what you have handled.
Lets you export your data
Download your account data as JSON for your records.
One reply. Compounding returns.
An ad stops working the day you stop paying for it. A genuinely useful answer in the right thread keeps earning, in three different ways, on three different clocks.
Visibility today
The people reading that thread right now are the people already looking. You arrive while the question is still open.
Proof that lasts
A helpful answer under a real question, in public, with your name on it. That's the review nobody can buy and no ad can fake.
Search and AI presence
Reddit and Quora threads stay public and searchable for years, and they are the kind of page an assistant reads when someone asks your category question.
No rankings promised. Presence, not placement.
Threads a CRM could have replied to this month
Six example threads for one business, with the reason each one was picked. Yours would look like this, about your market.
Easiest way to track leads without losing follow-ups?
4h · 86 comments
Describes the exact workflow gap you close, and is shopping now.
What should a small business look for when choosing a CRM?
12 answers · 3.1k views
Evergreen question, ranks in Google, quoted in AI answers.
We switched CRMs and finally keep every web lead in one place
37 reactions · 14 comments
Public evaluation. Peers in the comments asking what they picked.
Spreadsheet finally broke. What did you move to?
1d · 42 comments
Switching language. Actively shortlisting right now.
Is a CRM worth it for a team of three?
7 answers · 940 views
The objection your pricing page already answers, asked in public.
Asking the group: what's your follow-up stack in 2026?
18 reactions · 9 comments
Open request for vendor names. No answer has won it yet.
Illustrative examples across four business types. Thread titles paraphrased.